Silicon Labs Silicon Labs Community
silabs.com
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 日本語
  • MCUs
    • 8-bit MCU
    • 32-bit MCU
  • Wireless
    • Bluetooth
    • Proprietary
    • Wi-Fi
    • Zigbee & Thread
    • Z-Wave
  • More Products
    • Interface
    • Isolation
    • Power
    • Sensors
    • Timing
  • Development Tools
    • Simplicity Studio
    • Third Party Tools
    • Thunderboard
  • Expert's Corner
    • Announcements
    • Blog
    • General Interest
    • Projects
  1. Community - Silicon Labs
  2. Blog

Do you Know the 6 Hidden Costs in a Wireless SoC?

02/55/2016 | 04:17 PM
Lance Looper
Employee

Level 5


Adding Wireless to Your Product?

 

There are generally two options:

 

Option 1: Use a wireless system-on-a-chip (SoC) directly on the product printed circuit board (PCB). A fully-integrated SoC has RF, analog and digital circuitry, and a microcontroller (MCU) on an easy to use, inexpensive integrated circuit.

  • Why use one? It’s smaller and cheaper than a wireless module.
  • Why not? There are lots of unknowns of designing it into a product. 

 

Option 2: Use a wireless module. It includes the same wireless SoC as Option 1, but most are fully characterized products, including RF and shielding, timing components (crystals), external bill of materials (BOM), regulatory approvals, and standards bodies’ certifications.

  • Why use one? It removes the unknowns of a wireless SoC.
  • Why not? They are bigger and more expensive than a wireless SoC.

 

There is a point in each product’s life when an “on-board” solution might make sense to save money. But it’s not always obvious, or tied to volume. Even the Apple iPhone 6 uses a Wi-Fi module instead of an SoC and it has shipped something close to 200 million units. Why?

 

Six Hidden Costs to Using an SoC

The answer may be one of the six hidden costs to using an SoC that every product development company needs to consider. Check out more detail of the summary bullets in this whitepaper.

 

  • RF Engineers – A company needs RF engineering expertise, or access to it, if they’re using RF on their PCBs. RF can be very tricky and RF engineers are expensive. Glassdoor.com estimates they cost $80-150K/year without benefits or overhead.

 

  • Lab Equipment and Facilities – Owning and equipping an RF lab is also expensive because it’s fundamentally required to do RF development.

Hidden Costs Image 1.png

 

  • PCB Layout and Antenna Selection – Even with RF engineers and lab equipment, getting the RF done correctly takes time. There is generally very good advice in RF Application Notes like AN930 for Bluetooth Smart. But it can be hard even when following these documents very carefully.

 

  • Regulatory Approvals and Wireless Standard Certifications – All wireless products in the unlicensed bands must be approved by various governments and standards bodies. Each certification costs money and can take multiple tries. They may even cause delays or product redesigns. Modules generally come with these certifications already in place.

 

  • Reduced Product Revenue from TTM Delays – All of the above can add up to product delays. If a product misses its target window, or if competing product beats it to market, the revenue projections can fall, reducing the target ROI.

 

  • Supply Management and Assurance – And of course, once a product is in the market it must have supply. If a company is using a module, it’s a single ordering part number with a the buying power of a consolidated module customer base. If it’s an SoC design, there are lots of components and supply may be an issue.

It’s not easy to predict all the reasons it might make sense to use a module over an SoC, or when the right time to switch to an SoC might be.

 

In fact, some companies have many products in production that use either an SoC or a module. When companies use modules and SoCs for the same functionality, they often use the same supplier for both so their software is portable between both types of designs. They can also be sure their support will be consistent for both products.

 

Silicon Labs offers both wireless SoCs like the wireless Geckos announced at Embedded World 2016, and modules that incorporate them. The software for them is portable, and both are supported by our world-class applications teams making it easy to move from modules to SoCs when the time is right.

 

Check out Silicon Labs Wireless Solutions.

Check out Silicon Labs Bluetooth Solutions.

Check out the whitepaper on hidden costs of SoCs.

  • Bluetooth Low Energy
  • Blog Posts
  • Internet of Things

Tags

  • Wireless
  • High Performance Jitter Attenuators
  • EFR32MG21 Series 2 SoCs
  • Blue Gecko Series 2
  • Zigbee SDK
  • ZigBee and Thread
  • Internet Infrastructure
  • Sensors
  • Blue Gecko Bluetooth Low Energy SoCs
  • Z-Wave
  • Micrium OS
  • Blog Posts
  • Low Jitter Clock Generators
  • Bluetooth Classic
  • Makers
  • Flex SDK
  • Tips and Tricks
  • Smart Homes
  • IoT Heroes
  • Reviews
  • RAIL
  • Simplicity Studio
  • Mighty Gecko SoCs
  • Timing
  • Blue Gecko Bluetooth Low Energy Modules
  • Clocks
  • Ultra Low Jitter Clock Generators
  • General Purpose Clock Generators
  • Industry 4.0
  • Giant Gecko
  • 32-bit MCUs
  • blue-gecko-xpress-modules
  • Bluetooth Low Energy
  • 32-bit MCU SDK
  • Gecko
  • Microcontrollers
  • News and Events
  • Industrial Automation
  • Wi-Fi
  • Bluetooth SDK
  • Community Spotlight
  • Biometric Sensors
  • General Purpose Jitter Attenuators
  • Giant Gecko S1
  • Flex Gecko
  • Internet of Things
  • 8-bit MCUs
  • Isolation
  • Powered Devices

Top Authors

  • Avatar image Mark Mulrooney
  • Avatar image Siliconlabs
  • Avatar image Nari Shin
  • Avatar image lynchtron
  • Avatar image deirdrewalsh
  • Avatar image Lance Looper
  • Avatar image lethawicker

Archives

  • 2014 December
  • 2015 January
  • 2015 February
  • 2015 March
  • 2015 April
  • 2015 May
  • 2015 June
  • 2015 July
  • 2015 August
  • 2015 September
  • 2015 October
  • 2015 November
  • 2015 December
  • 2016 January
  • 2016 February
  • 2016 March
  • 2016 April
  • 2016 May
  • 2016 June
  • 2016 July
  • 2016 August
  • 2016 September
  • 2016 October
  • 2016 November
  • 2016 December
  • 2017 January
  • 2017 February
  • 2017 March
  • 2017 April
  • 2017 May
  • 2017 June
  • 2017 July
  • 2017 August
  • 2017 September
  • 2017 October
  • 2017 November
  • 2017 December
  • 2018 January
  • 2018 February
  • 2018 March
  • 2018 April
  • 2018 May
  • 2018 June
  • 2018 July
  • 2018 August
  • 2018 September
  • 2018 October
  • 2018 November
  • 2018 December
  • 2019 January
  • 2019 February
  • 2019 March
  • 2019 April
  • 2019 May
  • 2019 June
  • 2019 July
  • 2019 August
  • 2019 September
  • 2019 October
  • 2019 November
Silicon Labs
  • About Us
  • In the News
  • Email Newsletter
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us
  • Community
  • Site Feedback
  • Investor Relations
  • Blog
  • Privacy and Terms
  • Corporate Citizenship
Copyright © Silicon Laboratories. All rights reserved.
粤ICP备15107361号-1