- Community
- Blog
Tags
- Wireless
- EFR32MG21 Series 2 SoCs
- Blue Gecko Series 2
- Zigbee SDK
- ZigBee and Thread
- Internet Infrastructure
- Sensors
- Blue Gecko Bluetooth Low Energy SoCs
- Z-Wave
- Micrium OS
- Blog Posts
- Low Jitter Clock Generators
- Bluetooth Classic
- Makers
- Flex SDK
- Tips and Tricks
- timing
- Smart Homes
- IoT Heroes
- Reviews
- RAIL
- Simplicity Studio
- EFR32MG22 Series 2 SoCs
- Mighty Gecko SoCs
- Timing
- Blue Gecko Bluetooth Low Energy Modules
- Ultra Low Jitter Clock Generators
- General Purpose Clock Generators
- Industry 4.0
- Giant Gecko
- 32-bit MCUs
- blue-gecko-xpress-modules
- Bluetooth Low Energy
- 32-bit MCU SDK
- Gecko
- Microcontrollers
- Jitter Attenuators
- News and Events
- Industrial Automation
- Wi-Fi
- Bluetooth SDK
- Community Spotlight
- Clock Generators
- Biometric Sensors
- Giant Gecko S1
- Flex Gecko
- Internet of Things
- 8-bit MCUs
- Isolation
- Powered Devices
Archives
- 2015 February
- 2015 March
- 2015 April
- 2015 May
- 2015 June
- 2015 July
- 2015 August
- 2015 September
- 2015 October
- 2015 November
- 2015 December
- 2016 January
- 2016 February
- 2016 March
- 2016 April
- 2016 May
- 2016 June
- 2016 July
- 2016 August
- 2016 September
- 2016 October
- 2016 November
- 2016 December
- 2017 January
- 2017 February
- 2017 March
- 2017 April
- 2017 May
- 2017 June
- 2017 July
- 2017 August
- 2017 September
- 2017 October
- 2017 November
- 2017 December
- 2018 January
- 2018 February
- 2018 March
- 2018 April
- 2018 May
- 2018 June
- 2018 July
- 2018 August
- 2018 September
- 2018 October
- 2018 November
- 2018 December
- 2019 January
- 2019 February
- 2019 March
- 2019 April
- 2019 May
- 2019 June
- 2019 July
- 2019 August
- 2019 September
- 2019 October
- 2019 November
- 2019 December
- 2020 January
- 2020 February
Silicon Labs Bluetooth Implementations Unaffected by BlueBorne
A collection of Bluetooth vulnerabilities named “BlueBorne” has just been made public by the security research company Armis. The vulnerabilities are not in the Bluetooth standard itself, but rather in the specific implementations of the Bluetooth standard. The Silicon Labs Bluetooth implementation is different from the affected implementations. Therefore, products based on our Bluetooth software are immune to BlueBorne.
This has been disclosed responsibly, which means that vendors have had time to issue security patches. Therefore, please update and patch all Bluetooth-products based on Android, Windows, iOS or Linux! And if in doubt, follow best practice and update all smart products regardless of protocol and software platform.
As a note, fighting BlueBorne shows the importance of being able to software upgrade connected devices, as discussed here:
http://www.newelectronics.co.uk/electronics-technology/the-iot-requires-upgradable-security/156211/
References:
https://www.armis.com/blueborne/
https://www.wired.com/story/turn-off-bluetooth-security/
https://techcrunch.com/2017/09/12/new-bluetooth-vulnerability-can-hack-a-phone-in-ten-seconds/
It would be good to know what backs up the claim in the post. Having a "different implementation" does not guaranty that it doesn't suffer from the same or similar issue. Blueborne is a great example of that because it shows one specific vulnerability being present in both Windows and Android stacks. And these two are completely different implementations.
What kind of analysis and testing has been performed to justify the conclusion that SiLabs Bluetooth stack is not susceptible to this set of vulnerabilities?
Hi David, thanks for the question. First, note that BlueBorne is a total of 8 vulnerabilities across many profiles and components. Only two of these are relevant for Bluetooth LE; L2CAP and SDP. The others are not supported by us in any products. For L2CAP and SDP, our architecture is completely different from the affected implementations, and we have analyzed our implementation to verify that our stack is not vulnerable to the same attacks.