Member | Action | Date |
---|---|---|
|
Replied
to
si5324 not locking
I just checked, nothing in my normal/spam/junk/trash folders.
Show more
|
14 days ago |
|
Replied
to
si5324 not locking
I will check again. In the meantime, are you able to edit your post to remove my email address? I'd prefer it to stay private.
Show more
|
14 days ago |
|
Replied
to
si5324 not locking
I am having trouble signing in to access the system case. I try my username/email/password and I get "Unable to sign in." I've tried the "Unlock Account" feature, but I never get the email.
Show more
|
16 days ago |
|
Posted
si5324 not locking on
Clock Generator, Buffer, Crystal Oscillator Forum
Hello. I have a si5324 chip with a 114.285 MHz crystal on the XA/XB pins, and a 156.25 MHz clock on the CKIN1 pins. I am I used the DSPLLsim tool to generate the register settings, in which I have successfully configured and verified.
Also, I am continually writing a 0x00 to register 132 to clear the latched status bits. I have waited quite a long time These are the settings generated from the DSPLLsim tool:
One more note: If I read the I2C registers immediately after I write to them, the verify comes back good (the values match), however, |
23 days ago |
|
Updated
si5324 not locking on
Clock Generator, Buffer, Crystal Oscillator Forum
Hello. I have a si5324 chip with a 114.285 MHz crystal on the XA/XB pins, and a 156.25 MHz clock on the CKIN1 pins. I am trying to generate a "cleaned" 156.25 MHz clock on the CKOUT1 output pins. CKIN2 and CKOUT2 are left floating. I used the DSPLLsim tool to generate the register settings, in which I have successfully configured and verified. However, I'm getting the following results when I read the status registers:
Also, I am continually writing a 0x00 to register 132 to clear the latched status bits. I have waited quite a long time These are the settings generated from the DSPLLsim tool:
One more note: If I read the I2C registers immediately after I write to them, the verify comes back good (the values match), however, after I've run the calibration, the values are automatically changed in the following registers: 31, 32, 36, 42. Is this normal and expected? |
23 days ago |
|
Updated
to
C8051F911 migration
I have looked at the sleepy bee i(efmsb1) n the past, but the datasheet the Sleep mode (sleep mode with RAM retention) lists a "typical" value of 50 nA, which is higher than the 10 nA claimed in the C8051F911 datasheet. As for the EFP01, it's got a 150 nA quiesient current with no outputs enabled, and 300 nA with a single output enabled. Also, the efficiency drops pretty low when the load is only 10 nA. So unless I'm misunderstanding something, your solution seems orders of magnitude worse in terms of power consumption. If it helps, my application spends 99.999% of its time in sleep mode waiting for a GPIO event, and runs off a coin cell battery.
|
Sep 16 2020, 10:08 PM |
|
Replied
to
C8051F911 migration
I have looked at the sleepy bee i(efmsb1) n the past, but the datasheet is unclear what the actual max current consumption is in Sleep mode (sleep mode with RAM retention). It lists a "typical" value of 50 nA, which is higher than the 10 nA claimed in the C8051F911 datasheet. As for the EFP01, it's got a 150 nA quiesient current with no outputs enabled, and 300 nA with a single output enabled. Also, the efficiency drops pretty low when the load is only 10 nA. So unless I'm misunderstanding something, your solution seems orders of magnitude worse in terms of power consumption. If it helps, my application spends 99.999% of its time in sleep mode waiting for a GPIO event, and runs off a coin cell battery.
|
Sep 16 2020, 10:07 PM |
|
Posted
C8051F911 migration on
8-bit MCU - Microcontroller Forum
I noticed that the webpage for the C8051F911 says that it's not recommended for new designs. What would be an equivalent/improved part that is recommended for new designs? I think the specs that are difficult to match is the fact that it can operate down to 0.9V and has a 10 nA sleep mode with memory retention. |
Sep 13 2020, 12:39 PM |
|
Posted
SLSTK3701A mechanical drawing on
Forum
Is there a mechanical drawing or 3d model of SLSTK3701A? I can't seem to find one.
Show more
|
Dec 15 2018, 2:45 PM |
|
Posted
Simplicity Studio 4 taking a long time to startup on
Forum
Greetings. I am consistently experiencing very long startup times on getting Simplicity Studio 4 to start. It seems to get stuck on the splash screen with "Loading org.eclipse.ui.forms." Sometimes if I wait for about 5 minutes the IDE will finally show up, other times it will just stall out forever, giving me a "this program is not responding" message from Windows. Any tricks to getting a more reliable startup of this program? |
Dec 09 2018, 7:07 PM |