Member | Action | Date |
---|---|---|
|
Posted
Zigbee no-audible smoke detector? on
Zigbee Forum - Thread Network Forum
Hello everyone,, In a bushfire situation (Australia) embers can enter a home through the eves and smoulder for days before developing into a fire. I am after a smoke detector without a built-in alarm that could detect the smoke under the roof before it breaks out into fire. So far I have been pleased with the sensors from Xiaomi and wonder if anyone know of a similar sized unit for smoke detection? |
16 days ago |
|
Updated
Zigbee no-audible smoke detector? on
Zigbee Forum - Thread Network Forum
Hello everyone,, In a bushfire situation (Australia) embers can enter a home through the eves and smoulder for days before developing into a fire. I am after a smoke detector without a built-in alarm that could detect the smoke under the roof before it breaks out into fire https://speedtest.vet/ https://vidmate.bid/. So far I have been pleased with the sensors from Xiaomi and wonder if anyone know of a similar sized unit for smoke detection? |
16 days ago |
|
Posted
Choosing the right mesh protocol as Zigbee, 6LowPAN, etc. over 805.15.4 on
Zigbee Forum - Thread Network Forum
I'm trying to find best suitable mesh protocol for a new project. Project area is an outdoor field and every node should be ~10 meters away each in a square-grid structure. Also nodes will be mount over rotatable metal plate which can reflect signals anywhere else.
In the past, I used ~500 ZigBee nodes (actually XBee s2c modules) in 12 clusters, and it didn't satisfy me. Because it had worked healthy by around 40 nodes per a coordinator, and it wasn't enough(or costy) to reach high node counts like 10k nodes. Every coordinator is a huge payload in my software system, so I want to reduce coordinator counts.
Now, for a new project, I decided to use "NCS36510" SOC and I going to create a tree mesh with this chips up to 10,000 nodes! In this project, I just want to achieve that, sending and reading data from this nodes periodically (few bytes per 10 secs for example) and update node's firmware remotely. So I need a robust protocol over 805.15.4 to use over these chips in lower coordinator/edge device as possible and not really need to be that fast.
Is it good idea to use 6LowPAN? Or do you have any other suggestion to success? Thanks. |
Feb 07 2021, 8:56 PM |
|
Updated
Choosing the right mesh protocol as Zigbee, 6LowPAN, etc. over 805.15.4 on
Zigbee Forum - Thread Network Forum
I'm trying to find best suitable mesh protocol for a new project. Project area is an outdoor field and every node should be ~10 meters away each in a square-grid structure. Also nodes will be mount over rotatable metal plate which can reflect signals anywhere else.
In the past, I used ~500 ZigBee nodes (actually XBee s2c modules) in 12 clusters, and it didn't satisfy me. Because it had worked healthy by around 40 nodes per a coordinator, and it wasn't enough(or costy) to reach high node counts like 10k nodes. Every coordinator is a huge payload in my software system, so I want to reduce coordinator counts https://speedtest.vet/ https://vidmate.bid/.
Now, for a new project, I decided to use "NCS36510" SOC and I going to create a tree mesh with this chips up to 10,000 nodes! In this project, I just want to achieve that, sending and reading data from this nodes periodically (few bytes per 10 secs for example) and update node's firmware remotely. So I need a robust protocol over 805.15.4 to use over these chips in lower coordinator/edge device as possible and not really need to be that fast.
Is it good idea to use 6LowPAN? Or do you have any other suggestion to success? Thanks. |
Feb 07 2021, 8:56 PM |