Enhanced filtering of EFR32 Series 1-based designs for XO reference spur suppression
07/203/2020 | 10:54 AM
The crystal or TCXO reference spur is located +/- XO frequency (typ. 38.4 MHz for EFR32 Series 1-based designs) from the RF carrier frequency. This KBA is focusing on the possible HW modifications that can be suggested to enhance the suppression of these XO reference spurs around the carrier frequency. Also, the KBA is based on the measurement results of EFR32 Series 1-based radio boards at the 868/915 MHz frequency bands.
An evident approach could be to apply a high-Q band-pass filter, e.g. SAW filter, in the RF path to filter out the XO reference spurs. This will ensure very low level of spurs in a reliable way, but on the other it will also increase the insertion loss at the fundamental frequency while it is not a desirable solution for cost sensitive applications.
The XO coupling is basically occurred through two main domains within the part: VCO and PA. These blocks are supplied through RFVDD and PAVDD and thus forming two coupling paths. The power supplies can be modulated either by VDD and/or GND. Leakage current paths outside the chip depend on board design through impedance at HFXO frequency between supply domains.
So, a filtering scheme focused for the XO frequency on both RFVDD and PAVDD nets can help suppress these spurs effectively. The table below shows some measurement data with different RFVDD and PAVDD filtering configurations, captured on BRD4164A Rev A02 radio board at 915 MHz / +20 dBm.
Fund power in dBm
XO spur at -38.4MHz
XO spur at +38.4MHz
subG PAVDD
RFVDD
dBm
dBc
dBm
dBc
19,48
-57,9
-77,4
-58,5
-78,0
ferrite + 1nF
ferrite + 1nF
19,51
-57,6
-77,1
-58,3
-77,8
ferrite + 1nF + 220pF
ferrite + 1nF
19,53
-57,7
-77,2
-58,3
-77,8
1nF + 220pF
ferrite + 1nF
19,57
-63,8
-83,4
-57,3
-76,9
ferrite + 56pF
1nF
19,6
-61,8
-81,4
-56,6
-76,2
56pF
1nF
19,57
-61,6
-81,2
-56,6
-76,2
56pF
56pF
19,49
-61,7
-81,2
-56,7
-76,2
1nF
56pF
19,46
-62,3
-81,8
-56,9
-76,4
ferrite + 1nF
56pF
19,45
-52,4
-71,9
-63,2
-82,7
ferrite + 1nF *
ferrite + 56pF *
19,48
-60,8
-80,3
-57,2
-76,7
ferrite + 1nF
ferrite + 56pF + 47nF
19,48
-60,9
-80,4
-57,2
-76,7
1nF
56pF + 47nF
19,5
-60,8
-80,3
-57
-76,5
47nF
56pF + 47nF
* Note: close to the original BOM of reference radio boards.
Some good performer configurations in terms of spur suppression are highlighted in yellow above.
The RFVDD is filtered at the RFVDD pin, while the subG PAVDD is filtered at the PAVDD pin and at the BIAS pin of the external ceramic balun.
Some conclusions:
The spur suppression of the radio board with the original filtering configuration can be improved.
Low-side XO spur is high when RFVDD has series ferrite but without nF-ranged capacitor. If RFVDD has no ferrite then a capacitor (either pF- or nF-ranged) is enough to have low-level low-side XO spur. Low-side spur is high on radio boards because RFVDD has a ferrite but with pF-ranged capacitors only.
The high-side XO spur is unfortunately pretty good only when the RFVDD has ferrite without nF-ranged capacitor.
Overall performance is better if the focus is on the low-side XO spur suppression, since that is more critical with the radio board's original BOM.
In absolute level, however, the spurs are well under -51dBm in any configuration shown above.
Further layout considerations:
If the RFVDD and PAVDD pins are supplied from the same power net, then consider adding a series filtering placeholder mounted between them.
Maximize the isolation between the crystal/TCXO, XO traces and RFVDD trace on the board layout. Ensure having a GND strip with stitching vias between the XO and RFVDD traces.
Enhanced filtering of EFR32 Series 1-based designs for XO reference spur suppression
The crystal or TCXO reference spur is located +/- XO frequency (typ. 38.4 MHz for EFR32 Series 1-based designs) from the RF carrier frequency. This KBA is focusing on the possible HW modifications that can be suggested to enhance the suppression of these XO reference spurs around the carrier frequency. Also, the KBA is based on the measurement results of EFR32 Series 1-based radio boards at the 868/915 MHz frequency bands.
An evident approach could be to apply a high-Q band-pass filter, e.g. SAW filter, in the RF path to filter out the XO reference spurs. This will ensure very low level of spurs in a reliable way, but on the other it will also increase the insertion loss at the fundamental frequency while it is not a desirable solution for cost sensitive applications.
The XO coupling is basically occurred through two main domains within the part: VCO and PA. These blocks are supplied through RFVDD and PAVDD and thus forming two coupling paths. The power supplies can be modulated either by VDD and/or GND. Leakage current paths outside the chip depend on board design through impedance at HFXO frequency between supply domains.
So, a filtering scheme focused for the XO frequency on both RFVDD and PAVDD nets can help suppress these spurs effectively. The table below shows some measurement data with different RFVDD and PAVDD filtering configurations, captured on BRD4164A Rev A02 radio board at 915 MHz / +20 dBm.
* Note: close to the original BOM of reference radio boards.
Some good performer configurations in terms of spur suppression are highlighted in yellow above.
The RFVDD is filtered at the RFVDD pin, while the subG PAVDD is filtered at the PAVDD pin and at the BIAS pin of the external ceramic balun.
Some conclusions:
Further layout considerations: